Skip to main content

Are We To Blame For The Violence In Sudan?


 Sudan has been in turmoil for many years due to political unrest, civil war, and ongoing violence. The country's complex history has been marked by ethnic divisions and economic conflicts that have led to frequent conflicts. As the world watches helplessly, we are left to wonder - are we partly responsible for this tragedy?


In this blog post, we will explore the causes of violence in Sudan, examine the role of various actors, including the international community and the media, and finally explore whether we can be held accountable. Join us in solving this complex issue affecting millions of people around the world.


The current situation in Sudan is dire, to say the least. The country has recently experienced a military coup that led to the ouster of longtime dictator Omar al-Bashir. However, instead of bringing stability and peace, this change led to more violence as citizens took to the streets demanding civilian-led governance.


The Sudanese government responded with brutal force, killing an estimated 100 people and injuring over 700. In addition, there have been reports of rape and other human rights violations by security forces. The internet has also been shut down for weeks in an attempt to silence dissenting voices.


The ongoing conflict in Darfur also continues, with hundreds of thousands of people displaced from their homes due to fighting between rebel groups and government forces. In addition, tensions remain high between the various ethnic groups throughout Sudan.


The current situation in Sudan is characterized by instability and chaos that shows no signs of ending anytime soon.

Sudan, located in Northeast Africa, has had a long and complicated history. The ancient Nubian civilization flourished along the Nile River 5,000 years ago. Later, Sudan became an important center of trade routes between Africa and the Middle East.


In the 19th century, Egypt conquered Sudan and ruled it until Britain took control in 1898. Sudan was then governed as two separate regions: North Sudan under Egyptian rule and South Sudan under British rule.


After gaining independence from Britain and Egypt in 1956, political instability plagued the country due to ethnic tensions between Northern Arab Muslims and Southern African Christians. This led to two civil wars that lasted a total of more than four decades.


The most recent conflict began in the Darfur region in 2003 when rebel groups protested against discrimination by the government dominated by Arab Muslims towards non-Arab Africans. The government responded with brutal force which resulted in widespread violence leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths.


Understanding this tumultuous history is crucial for comprehending why there is still unrest today in Sudan.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how In the midst of a junction second for the mainland in the wake of the pandemic, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will convey her yearly condition of the association address one week from now after a staggering time in office up until this point. I guess with the most noticeably awful of the Covid emergency perhaps now finished, Brussels is at a tipping point between the difficulties that have faced it for the beyond quite a long while and a more brilliant, new first light. For me, In the event that fortune favors the EU-27, there may now be a noteworthy open door for the alliance to work back better.