Skip to main content

Three Al-Qaeda suspects killed in Yemen drone strike: Report

 


Three Al-Qaeda suspects were killed in a suspected US (United States) drone strike in northeastern Yemen, according to local government officials.

The US drone strike took place in Marib province in Yemen. The attack was carried out on a car, the officials said. A government official told AFP that the drone strike was believed to be American.

The suspected Al-Qaeda militants were in a car in Wadi Obeida when they were targeted by the suspected US strike. A government official from Marib confirmed the strike on suspected Al-Qaeda militants. Washington has not yet commented on the recent incident.

The US reportedly considers Al-Qaeda’s Yemen branch - Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) - as one of the most dangerous branches of the global jihadist network. AQAP is a militant Sunni Islamist terrorist group loyal to Daesh. The US has targeted the leaders of the group for over two decades.

According to Arab News, AQAP has carried out operations against the Houthi militia and government forces in Yemen. Al Qaeda remains active in Yemen.

Recently, the US started offering up to $5 million for information on Ibrahim Al Banna, a senior leader of Al Qaeda's affiliate in Yemen. The US State Department said that Al Banna is the last surviving founding member of AQAP.

The US officially designated Al Banna as a terrorist in the year 2017. The US designated Aqap as a terrorist group in 2010. The Aqap claimed responsibility for a number of terrorist attacks.

The group also claimed responsibility for the attack on the offices of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris in 2015 that killed 12 people. The group armed with rifles and other weapons killed 12 people while attacking the magazine’s office in Paris.

Al Banna is also believed to have planned the 1993 assassination attempt on former Egyptian prime minister Atef Sedky.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“A Reminder for the Role of Nuclear Program”

This is something great that I want to share about what I read today. It’s how whether or not Iran's nuclear program is expected for non military personnel purposes or for creating atomic weapons is quite possibly the most major problem with regards to local and worldwide harmony and security. The reaction to this inquiry will characterize what approaches different governments should seek after toward the Iranian system and its atomic aspirations. Yet, on the off chance that we carefully look at the historical backdrop of Tehran's nuclear program, it becomes completely clear that it was planned for creating nuclear weapons from the beginning. For me, the other reason would the system's nuclear record be loaded up with mystery and undercover exercises, when the Iranian chiefs could really benefit on the off chance that they uncovered all their atomic locales?