Skip to main content

Congress endorses limits on Trump’s actions against Iran

The House of Representatives of the US Congress, controlled by Democrats, approved on Wednesday a resolution limiting the powers of President Donald Trump in the use of armed forces against Iran.  In mid-February, the Senate of the American legislature approved the initiative.

The initiative was approved by 227 congressmen, 186 legislators spoke out against.

Now the resolution is being sent to the head of state’s table, which, as the White House said earlier, intends to veto it.  Democrats currently do not have enough votes in the Republican-controlled upper house of Congress to overcome the presidential veto.

The resolution obliges the president not to start military operations against Iran and on its territory until the US administration receives the appropriate permission from Congress, or an “imminent attack on the United States” occurs.  If military operations against Iran have already been launched, the resolution orders the US administration to stop them within 30 days for the period until the approval of the legislators is received.

The author of the document was a former candidate for the post of vice president of the United States from the Democratic Party, Senator Tim Kane (from the state of Virginia).  According to him, the resolution "is not directed against President Trump, it will be equally applied to any president."  "The fundamental question is that Congress is responsible for the most important decision that we must make," Kane said.

In February, a Republican president on his Twitter page called on party members to vote against the resolution for national security.  Her approval, Trump believes, "would be a very bad signal."

In January, the House of Representatives adopted a similar resolution, but it, unlike the current one, was not binding and was declarative in nature.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

Jenna Ortega talks about Wednesday Season 2

  Jenna Ortega, a successful American actress who rose to fame with the Wednesday series, has opened up about season 2 of Wednesday. Jenna Ortega, the show's leading lady, extensively spoke about Wednesday season 2. She talked about major updates on the genre of Season 2. She confirmed that season 2 contains horror elements. In an interview with Variety, the Wednesday actress stated, “We have decided that we want to lean into the horror aspect of the show a little bit more. Because it is so light-hearted, and a show like this with vampires and werewolves and superpowers, you don’t want to take yourself too seriously.” She said that season 2 ditched the idea of a love interest. In March this year, she confirmed the second season of Wednesday. She said that the series would focus more on horror and less on romance. In a Saturday Night Live episode, she said that the character of Wednesday Addams would be an individual going forward in the second season of the series. The ac...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...