Skip to main content

Troops fly to save Tajikistan

Over 1,000 Afghan troops flee to Tajikistan to ‘save lives’ after clashes with Taliban. More Afghan troops have fled across the border to Tajikistan to “save their own lives”, amid a surge of violence in Afghanistan in recent weeks, allegedly between the Taliban and the Afghan army. The official statement troops reads during the armed clashes with the Taliban, 1,037 servicemen of the Afghan governmental forces, in order to save the lives of their personnel, retreated and entered into Tajikistan through the border areas. 

The uptick in violence comes as the US, UK and allies withdraw forces from Afghanistan after nearly two decades. Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen said the group was not responsible for the recent increase in violence, and that many districts had fallen to the Taliban “through mediation”, after Afghan soldiers refused to fight them.

In April, US President Joe Biden had announced a full withdrawal of US and allied troops from Afghanistan by 11 September this year, which would end America’s longest war. This is an extension of the 1 May deadline earlier brokered by the Donald Trump administration and the Taliban. The deal entails the withdrawal of US and its NATO allies on the commitment that the Taliban will not allow any extremist group to operate in the areas they controlled. However, the Taliban did not agree to stop fighting Afghan forces. 

This latest retreat is the third such by the Afghan troops into Tajikistan reported in the past three days, and in total, nearly 1,600 soldiers have crossed the border.  In response to the crossing over of the Afghan soldiers into Tajikistan, Tajik President Emomali Rahmon ordered the mobilization of 20,000 reserve troops to the border. The Taliban has ceased attacks on western forces but continues to target Afghan government and security installations as it makes rapid territorial gains across the country.  Peace talks between the two sides remain inconclusive. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“A Reminder for the Role of Nuclear Program”

This is something great that I want to share about what I read today. It’s how whether or not Iran's nuclear program is expected for non military personnel purposes or for creating atomic weapons is quite possibly the most major problem with regards to local and worldwide harmony and security. The reaction to this inquiry will characterize what approaches different governments should seek after toward the Iranian system and its atomic aspirations. Yet, on the off chance that we carefully look at the historical backdrop of Tehran's nuclear program, it becomes completely clear that it was planned for creating nuclear weapons from the beginning. For me, the other reason would the system's nuclear record be loaded up with mystery and undercover exercises, when the Iranian chiefs could really benefit on the off chance that they uncovered all their atomic locales?