Skip to main content

US Elections 2020: Trump refuses peaceful power transition post elections

 

There have been consistent concerns that President Trump may not peacefully hand over his office if he loses in November elections. The concerns were reinforced on Wednesday when he said that he would not commit to peaceful transition of power after Election Day. “Well, we’re going to have to see what happens,” President Donald Trump said in White House news conference when was asked of his commitment to peaceful transition of power which is one of the cornerstones of American democracy. Earlier on many occasions Trump has refused to directly comment on whether he would accept the election results. He also has jokingly said that he would stay in office well beyond the two terms, which is in contrast to maximum two terms allowed constitutionally. But his latest refusal to guarantee to transition free of violence has gone further down the road, likely to alarm Democrats and his critics who are already on edge with his sheer will to deploy federal law enforcements to handle country-wide protests recently.

 

President Donald Trump and his administration have maintained their concerns regarding mail-in ballots and its authenticity – asserting it to be more of an illegitimate election. The claims of mail-in ballot to be a fraud have been a direct indication of Trump’s sentiments towards this year’s elections. “You know that I’ve been complaining very strongly about the ballots and the ballots are a disaster,” President Trump said at a recent White House press briefing.

 

“Get rid of the ballots and you’ll have a very…there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There’ll be a continuation. The ballots are out of control.” Trump’s insinuation directs that if ballots stay then he will lose, that will be illegitimate election, and he won’t take the path of peaceful transition of power. That’s enough reasons to question Trump’s modus operandi post November outcome.

 

Trump’s hasty move to replace Supreme Court justice position vacant after demise of Ruth Bader Ginsburg are also raising questions. GOP is going against the precedent set by it in 2016 of not appointing justice when Obama was in office. Now the fact that it is hell bent in moving forward with the appointment is controversial. Trump has himself revealed that his interest in appointing his nominee for the post is largely to tilt the scale to his side if November results warrant so.

 

Sen. Mitt Romney, Utah Republican, who vowed to vote for Trump’s Supreme Court justice nominee has slammed President’s Wednesday comments. He tweeted, “Fundamental to democracy is the peaceful transition of power; without that, there is Belarus. Any suggestion that a president might not respect this Constitutional guarantee is both unthinkable and unacceptable.”

 

Democrats have criticized the recent statements made by President Trump. His Democratic opponent former Vice President Joe Biden called Trump’s statement as “irrational”. Biden’s campaign said that they are prepared for all the shenanigans Trump would throw.

 

Every elections in the history of the United States of America have seen graceful acceptance of election results by both the Presidential contestants, and with always a peaceful transition of power. The statements by President Trump are on the contrast side, indicating a distasteful approach to fair elections and results.

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how In the midst of a junction second for the mainland in the wake of the pandemic, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will convey her yearly condition of the association address one week from now after a staggering time in office up until this point. I guess with the most noticeably awful of the Covid emergency perhaps now finished, Brussels is at a tipping point between the difficulties that have faced it for the beyond quite a long while and a more brilliant, new first light. For me, In the event that fortune favors the EU-27, there may now be a noteworthy open door for the alliance to work back better.