Saudi crown prince receives a message from Bangladesh PM

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman received a written message from Bangladesh’s Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina Wazed, on ways to strengthen bilateral between the two countries.

The message was received by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Waleed bin Abdulkarim Al-Khuraiji, when he met with Bangladeshi Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Mohammed Javed Patwary, on Thursday.

During the meeting, the two leaders discussed ways to strengthen bilateral relations in various fields. Bangladesh’s Prime Minister aims to strengthen the relationship with the Kingdom.

Saudi Ambassador to Bangladesh, Essa bin Yousef Al Duhailan, also said that Saudi Arabia will always remain beside Bangladesh in various aspects. He affirmed that Saudi-Bangladesh's relation is deep-rooted and based on a strong foundation of religious, cultural, economic and humanitarian ties

He further said that Saudi-Bangladesh relations grew stronger after the visit of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to the Kingdom in 2016 and meeting with the King of Saudi Arabia, King Salman Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud.

Reportedly, around 2.6 million Bangladeshis are working in KSA. He said that the Kingdom has always supported these labourers. Bangladesh is also seeking to tap into the Saudi market to increase its presence in the Middle East region.

The Export Promotion Bureau under the Bangladeshi Ministry of Commerce said that the country is hopeful that the upcoming Trade and Investment Fair 2022, which will take place in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, from October 6 to 8, will be able to help increase Dhaka’s currently insignificant stake in the Saudi market.

In 2021, Bangladeshi exports to Saudi Arabia were about $300 million. The bureau’s Vice Chairman A. H. M. Ahsan said that the country seeks to increase trade by the end of this year to $350 million

Comments

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes. Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“A Reminder for the Role of Nuclear Program”

This is something great that I want to share about what I read today. It’s how whether or not Iran's nuclear program is expected for non military personnel purposes or for creating atomic weapons is quite possibly the most major problem with regards to local and worldwide harmony and security. The reaction to this inquiry will characterize what approaches different governments should seek after toward the Iranian system and its atomic aspirations. Yet, on the off chance that we carefully look at the historical backdrop of Tehran's nuclear program, it becomes completely clear that it was planned for creating nuclear weapons from the beginning. For me, the other reason would the system's nuclear record be loaded up with mystery and undercover exercises, when the Iranian chiefs could really benefit on the off chance that they uncovered all their atomic locales?

Newsaholic

Search This Blog