India condemns Turkish interference in Kashmir

Turkey still interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. The engagement of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan doesn't limit only to Syria, Libya and Yemen where Erdogan still supporting and financing extremists groups, Turkish interference is becoming more clear even in India.

Last week president Erdogan visited Pakistan, talking with journalists the Muslim Brotherhood leader said the situation in Indian Kashmir was worsening because of sweeping changes New Delhi introduced in the Muslim-majority territory and that Turkey stood in solidarity with the people of Kashmir.

On Monday India summoned Turkish ambassador, Sakir Ozkan Torunlar, asking him to clarify recent remarks of sultan Erdogan. According to Reuters, "This recent episode is but one more example of a pattern of Turkey interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. India finds that completely unacceptable," foreign ministry spokesman Raveesh Kumar said.

India brought Kashmir under its federal control withdrawing the autonomy of the region, which has been subject of a dispute between India, Pakistan and China since the mid-20th century. The Indian Foreign minister stressed Torunlar that Erdogan's comments lacked any understanding of the history of the Kashmir dispute.

"This recent episode is just one more example of a pattern of Turkey interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. India finds that completely unacceptable". India Foreign Ministry spokesman pointed out.

Earlier in 2017 Erdogan traveled to New Delhi to participate to the Turkey-India business summit. In that time Erdoğan suggested a multi-lateral dialogue on Kashmir, offering to mediate through his good offices between India and Pakistan. India has always categorically rejected Turkey’s intervention, while Pakistan welcomed Erdoğan’s offer.

Today India blames Turkey for supporting Pakistan and cross border terrorism stoking the revolt in the region of Kashmir, a territory in which tens of thousands of people -almost civilians- have been killed.

Comments

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes. Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“A Reminder for the Role of Nuclear Program”

This is something great that I want to share about what I read today. It’s how whether or not Iran's nuclear program is expected for non military personnel purposes or for creating atomic weapons is quite possibly the most major problem with regards to local and worldwide harmony and security. The reaction to this inquiry will characterize what approaches different governments should seek after toward the Iranian system and its atomic aspirations. Yet, on the off chance that we carefully look at the historical backdrop of Tehran's nuclear program, it becomes completely clear that it was planned for creating nuclear weapons from the beginning. For me, the other reason would the system's nuclear record be loaded up with mystery and undercover exercises, when the Iranian chiefs could really benefit on the off chance that they uncovered all their atomic locales?

Newsaholic

Search This Blog