Skip to main content

Indian government says, “U.S. sanctions on Iran have no bearing on India’s Chabahar port project”

 


External Affairs Minister of the Indian government, S. Jaishankar said, “U.S. sanctions on Iran have no bearing on India’s Chabahar port project.” He said those words in Lok Sabha on Friday. Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) member, Ritesh Pandey asked the minister to give clarification on U.S sanctions on Iran. To which, the minister replied that U.S sanctions are not relevant to India’s Chabahar port project in Iran.

During the Question Hour in Lok Sabha, Ritesh Pandey said that the Iranian government has claimed that the Chabahar port project has been miserably delayed due to sanctions imposed by the US. He further claimed that China is reportedly trying to work on the project by taking advantage of U.S sanctions on Iran. Chabahar port is located on the Gulf of Oman. It is 72 km away from the Gwadar port in Pakistan which has been developed by China.

On which, the minister replied that his information is inaccurate as the sanctions have not affected India’s Chabahar port project. India signed the agreement with Iran in 2016 and took possession of the terminal in 2018. Indian Railways Construction Ltd. (IRCON) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Iranian Rail Ministry to provide all services for the establishment of the Transit and Transport Corridor.

Ritesh Pandey also asked another question to the government about the Taliban taking over the control of the Afghanistan government. He asked if India has signed a new agreement with Iran to continue using the Chabahar port to provide help to central Asian countries and Afghanistan after the Taliban took over the control of the Afghanistan government. The minister replied, “we are not required to have an agreement with the government of Afghanistan as the Chabahar port operations are limited to Iran.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

Jenna Ortega talks about Wednesday Season 2

  Jenna Ortega, a successful American actress who rose to fame with the Wednesday series, has opened up about season 2 of Wednesday. Jenna Ortega, the show's leading lady, extensively spoke about Wednesday season 2. She talked about major updates on the genre of Season 2. She confirmed that season 2 contains horror elements. In an interview with Variety, the Wednesday actress stated, “We have decided that we want to lean into the horror aspect of the show a little bit more. Because it is so light-hearted, and a show like this with vampires and werewolves and superpowers, you don’t want to take yourself too seriously.” She said that season 2 ditched the idea of a love interest. In March this year, she confirmed the second season of Wednesday. She said that the series would focus more on horror and less on romance. In a Saturday Night Live episode, she said that the character of Wednesday Addams would be an individual going forward in the second season of the series. The ac...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...