Skip to main content

Middle East: Mossad chief promotes women at top


  Mossad Director David Barnea briefly emerged from the shadows on August 25 to denounce the upcoming nuclear agreement with Iran as being "based on lies" and the choice to leave open three investigations indicating undeclared Iranian nuclear activity as "an unprecedented national fraud," as was foreseen and reported here in an advance exclusive.

In recent days, Barnea briefed Prime Minister Yair Lapid and other top officials on the developing agreement with Iran. He also conducted several rare background briefings with reporters, explaining that even if the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) findings were still pending, once the deal was signed, nobody would move an inch to complete them.

The Mossad has recently evolved into a pioneer of gender emancipation while waging its covert fight to prevent Iran from nuclearization, a mission that the late agency head Meir Dagan was given with 20 years ago by the then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

Last Monday, the organisation made a historic announcement detailing the nomination of two women to its top leadership forum. The Chief of Military Intelligence's counterpart, A., a longtime Mossad employee who rose through the ranks of the mostly male organisation, now leads the Mossad's Intelligence Directorate. K., another longtime Mossad employee, is in charge of the Iran campaign and is responsible for dealing with Israel's most dangerous foe, including the nuclear threat it poses.

With the exception of its director, whose name is the only one in the Mossad hierarchy that is permitted for publication, the organisation never announces top appointments. Other office holders' names are forbidden. The concept of having women as significant enemies is probably not appealing to the Tehran ayatollahs.

Since their establishment more than 70 years ago, women have held positions in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the General Security Agency (Shin Bet), and the Mossad. Some have obtained high positions inside these institutions, but never the top positions. Women typically work in advising, human resources, or general staff duties when they are in top positions.

Barnea reportedly boasted to his coworkers about leading what he sees as a revolution, despite his insistence that the two women were chosen solely based on their qualifications and not as a result of affirmative action.

He was cited as stating, "They were both simply the best, the most qualified and the most appropriate," by a security source who spoke on the condition of anonymity. They didn't receive any free passes, either. Throughout the lengthy years of their ascent through the ranks, they were simply the greatest among all the men they faced competition from.

Israel was founded in 1948 as a secular, liberal state, but it has been gradually moving in more conservative, religious directions. A rising number of religious communities and organisations ban women from leadership and influential positions in public life, separate men and women at their public events, and relegate females to domestic roles such as wives, mothers, and breadwinners. This makes the top appointments of women in Israel's most prestigious security service all the more unexpected.

Israel is still a militarised, predominately male country with few women in positions of authority. The late Prime Minister Golda Meir, the only woman to lead the nation, was a transient phenomena brought on by political circumstances, but she will be most remembered for the terrible outcomes of the Arab-Israeli War in 1973, which took place during her tenure. Barnea’s appointments run counter to the strong macho culture that prevails behind closed doors of most senior security forums. Could his dramatic moves augur the naming of a woman as Mossad director? Right now, probably not. In the future, quite possibly

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...

“An Emergency Call for Afghanistan’s Current Issue”

This is something great that I want to share about what I read today. P erhaps the main issue ought to be to build up an instrument between willing companions of Afghanistan for standard coordination and counsel, and to send the Afghan individuals a message of consolation and fortitude. The coordination of compassionate help is likewise earnest and could be done by the gathering. It is likely too soon for most nations to take a reasonable political situation on the circumstance, which might entangle their work with some Afghan groups, however a call ought to go out to all Afghan gatherings to take part in arrangements toward a political arrangement. It ought to be underlined by the gathering that the global local area is prepared to draw in with all Afghan groups to work with the conveyance of help, yet in addition to keep the country from indeed turning into a shelter for fear based oppressors.