Skip to main content

EU claims deal with UK would take than Boris’ promised 11 months

On Thursday, European Union chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, during his speech in Stockholm said that EU and Britain would take more than year to reach a comprehensive deal, as opposed to the 11-month transition period which UK prime minister vouched for.

As per the Brexit deal, UK would exit the European bloc on January 31 and from there on two sides would have a transition period to reach a common ground on various rules, regulations and taxes. UK prime minister who was re-elected to power in December 2019, led the entire election campaign on getting Brexit done claiming that all the deals between EU and UK would be sealed by the end of 2020.

Clarifying over the timeline around Brexit, Barnier said,“We are ready to do our best and to do the maximum in the 11 months to secure a basic agreement with the UK, but we will need more time to agree on each and every point of this political declaration.”

Barnier added that 11-month period was relatively short to negotiate all the trade deals with UK, as it would involve multiple rounds of the discussions.

He said that the first point to focus is that two sides need time to build a new capacity to work together both bilaterally and as part of global institutions to address global issues such as climate change and peace in the Middle East.

He added, “The second point is that we need to build a very close security relationship.”

He concluded his statement by saying that EU would insist that it attains a level playing field with respect to UK to build a healthy economic partnership with it.
“Competing on social and environmental standards can only lead to a race to the bottom that puts workers, consumers and the planet on the losing side...If the UK wants an open link with us for the products; zero tariffs, zero quota, we need to be careful about what we call zero dumping,” Barnier said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Stepping Forward for the Betterment of the Country”

  Here’s something I want to share today. It’s about how there are chances of it turning into another sort of geo-monetary worry for states who dread that their vital financial influence will be subverted. Additionally, Suez Canal can be utilized by non-state entertainers as a monetary instrument to accomplish vital destinations. Notwithstanding their expressed places of keeping the channel open to worldwide exchange, significant forces have regularly played with making elective courses, though with restricted achievement. Notwithstanding, seen from the carefully adjusted international and geo-monetary stances in the Middle East, the Suez Canal could be an indicator for the district's financial fortunes.   Moreverc to guarantee they procure profits, all partners should keep on putting resources into the Suez Canal's security and life span to support financial advancement. In the most dire outcome imaginable, however, the waterway could in a real sense cripple worldwide excha...

Jenna Ortega talks about Wednesday Season 2

  Jenna Ortega, a successful American actress who rose to fame with the Wednesday series, has opened up about season 2 of Wednesday. Jenna Ortega, the show's leading lady, extensively spoke about Wednesday season 2. She talked about major updates on the genre of Season 2. She confirmed that season 2 contains horror elements. In an interview with Variety, the Wednesday actress stated, “We have decided that we want to lean into the horror aspect of the show a little bit more. Because it is so light-hearted, and a show like this with vampires and werewolves and superpowers, you don’t want to take yourself too seriously.” She said that season 2 ditched the idea of a love interest. In March this year, she confirmed the second season of Wednesday. She said that the series would focus more on horror and less on romance. In a Saturday Night Live episode, she said that the character of Wednesday Addams would be an individual going forward in the second season of the series. The ac...

“Iraq is Utilizing What They Have Right Now”

Here’s something good that I want to share with what I read today. It’s about  how Iraq utilizes a decentralized arrangement of administration, the Gulf countries and their organizations can investigate such financial possibilities with different individual Iraqi governorates, directed by the national government. This can likewise make a sound rivalry among Iraqi governorates to offer better costs and more good arrangements with Gulf organizations, as the two sides advantage. For me, Iraq needs huge monetary and monetary support. Monetary guide bundles can just reduce some tension on the present moment. Aside from Iran, there is insignificant territorial interest in Iraq's private area. Tehran's interest in Iraq has not given remarkable monetary advantages, for the most part because of authorizations. Inlet countries ought to investigate Iraq as a feasible competitor for their business ventures, and they can even use Jordan as a middle person to shape a solid financial ternio...