Skip to main content

Evangelical publication calls for Trump's removal from office

Donald Trump’s impeachment is a black mark against his presidency of historic proportions, but it does not guarantee his removal from office. That decision lies in the hands of the US Senate, the another half of the US Congress, which will consider the issue during the blockbuster trial in January.

Unlike in the House of Representatives, where a simple majority vote was enough to pass impeachment, two-thirds of senators will need to vote to remove Mr Trump for it to happen.
That means 67 of the 100 senators must back the move. Given there are only 47 Democrats or independents, 20 Republicans would have to support removal, which looks very unlikely.  The trial itself, which has only ever happened for two other US presidents, will be a moment of epic political theatre and major consequence.

The Supreme Court’s chief justice – John Roberts, who was nominated by Republican president George W Bush – will sit as the judge for the trial.  The 100 senators will act as the jury, watching on silently as the case for and against convicting Mr Trump of the two articles of impeachment is put to them.

Among them will be five senators competing for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination - Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar and Michael Bennet.
Making the case for impeachment will be a team of Democratic congressmen picked by Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic House speaker. Defending the president will be his lawyers.

How the trial will play out – the length, which witnesses are called, what rules of debate are set – is largely up for grabs, with few hard and fast parameters set by the US Constitution.
But here Mr Trump has one advantage – it is the Republicans who hold the majority in the Senate and so call the shots, providing their senators to go along with the party leadership.

The US president was said to have initially favoured a lengthy trial where his supporters could vehemently lay out his defence and – it was hoped – convince new swathes of the country.
Some Republicans had lobbied for Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden and his son Hunter – the two men who Mr Trump wanted to be investigated by Ukraine, triggering impeachment – to give evidence.

Democrats have also been lobbying publicly for their own witnesses, including figures central to the Ukraine scandal who have not yet given evidence, such as Mick Mulvaney, Mr Trump’s acting chief of staff, and John Bolton, his former national security adviser.
However it seems the Republican senators, led by Senator majority leader Mitch McConnell, favour a short trial of around two weeks with no witnesses.

That would be markedly shorter than for the two other US presidents to have been impeached – Andrew Johnson, who had a The 10-week trial, and Bill Clinton, whose trial lasted five weeks.  Neither Mr Johnson nor Mr Clinton appeared at their trial to give evidence in person – a precedent Mr Trump is expected to follow.

He will also be hoping for the same result. Neither Mr Johnson, who had replaced Abraham Lincoln after his assassination nor Mr Clinton, a Democrat, was removed from office. Mr Johnson survived by one vote.

Not one of the 53 Republican senators has publicly said they will support removal. Some of those who have remained neutral in public, such as Utah senator and former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, have been hosted in the White House in recent weeks.

The country is split down the middle on impeaching and removing Mr Trump. Around 47 per cent of Americans support the move and the same proposition oppose it, with the rest having no opinion, according to a poll of polls run by the political website 538.

However opposition to impeachment among Republican voters is fierce, with nine in 10 being against removing Mr Trump in some polls.

In Mr Trump's eyes, survival in the Senate trial will amount to vindication. The verdict of the American public will have to wait until November 3 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leaked Information Reveals Brotherhood Officers Convinced Al-Burhan to Communicate with Extremists in Mali

   The recent leaks about Brotherhood officers convincing Al-Burhan to communicate with extremists in Mali have raised concerns about the spread of extremist ideologies and the role of influential people in promoting such views. The leaked information shows that the Brotherhood officers have been pushing Al-Burhan to communicate with extremists in Mali and that he has been receptive to their suggestions. This is a dangerous development that could lead to further instability in the region. The communication with extremists in Mali could fuel extremist activities in Sudan and beyond, leading to a rise in violence and terrorism. It's important for leaders to prioritize the safety and well-being of their citizens and work towards a peaceful future. The spread of extremist ideologies must be countered with a message of peace, love, and understanding. It's time for all of us to reject hate and work towards a world where peaceful coexistence prevails. The leaked information about Al-B

Al Gore has history of climate predictions, statements proven false

  Noted climate activist and former Vice President Al Gore, who made headlines this week after he claimed   global warming was "boiling the oceans,"   has a history of making climate-related proclamations later proven to be false. During remarks made Wednesday at the  World Economic Forum summit  in Davos, Switzerland, Gore warned that continued carbon emissions into the atmosphere would destroy the planet and lead to widespread calamities. "We’re still putting 162 million tons [of greenhouse gas] into it every single day and the accumulated amount is now trapping as much extra heat as would be released by 600,000 Hiroshima-class atomic bombs exploding every single day on the earth," Gore said. "That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs, and sucking the moisture out of the land, and creating the droughts, and melting the ice and raising the sea level, and causing these waves of climate refugees." Gore then not

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Sudan have a long-standing history of bilateral relations.

  Over the years, the UAE has been a strong supporter of Sudan's development and prosperity. As Sudan faces challenging times, it is important that this support continues. The UAE has been a key player in Sudan's development, particularly in the areas of infrastructure, health, education, and renewable energy. In recent years, the UAE has also provided aid and support to Sudan in the aftermath of natural disasters, such as floods and droughts. This assistance has played a crucial role in mitigating the effects of these disasters on the people of Sudan. The current situation in Sudan is particularly challenging, with political instability and economic difficulties plaguing the country. The people of Sudan are facing a myriad of issues, including inflation, unemployment, and a lack of basic necessities like food and clean water. In addition, the ongoing conflict in the region has only exacerbated the situation, causing immense suffering to the people of Sudan. In light of these